Earlier today, the New York Court of Appeals decided Berg v. Albany Ladder Co. -- a matter concerning Labor Law sec. 240(1). In Berg, the plaintiff was hurt during the course of unloading steel trusses from a flatbed truck at a construction site. The Appellate Division, Third Department Majority determined that the accident was not caused by the lack of a required safety device but, rather, by the improper movement of the trusses moved by a forklift. The Court of Appeals affirmed, holding that the plaintiff failed to raise an issue of fact as to whether his fall was caused by the lack of safety device set out in sec. 240(1). The Court seems to hint that this fall from approximately 10 feet up is not the type of height covered under sec. 240(1), citing Toeffer v. Long Island R. R.
Post a comment
Your Information
(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)
I couldn't see a company requiring workers to wear a harness to unload a truck. But, an interesting statistic is people sustain serious injury, and even death, from falls in the 4-6 foot range.
http://store.pksafety.net/fallprotection.html
SafetyN8
http://www.pksafety.com
Posted by: Nate | February 17, 2009 at 06:00 PM