The Appellate Division, First Department's recent decision in Rose v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. is an important for New York's products liability jurisprudence. The plaintiffs' contention was that, during the years in question, the relevant tobacco companies should have sold only "light" cigarettes (which contain relatively low levels of cancer-causing tar and addictive nicotine) and should not have sold regular cigarettes of the kind Ms. Rose smoked (which contain significantly higher levels of the aforementioned harmful substances). The plaintiff's theory was grounded on a negligent design cause of action.
The First Department analyzes the all-important feasible alternative product design prong of any design defect allegation. Justice Nardelli and Catterson dissented and, thus, the Court of Appeals will have a crack at the case.
NYCL will keep you informed of developments in the case.
Comments