« For Those Delinquent Lawyers: The Appellate Division, First Department WILL Suspend You From the Practice of Law | Main | Upcoming Case in New York Court of Appeals - Vicarious Liability Issue »

March 15, 2005

Comments

Gene

Do you happen to have a link to the decision?

From your description of the case, I am really curious as to the judge's reasoning. Under California law, this fact pattern would have probably given rise to a complaint alleging Negligent INfliction of Emotional Distress (witnessing negligent medical treatment / death of a child, with realization that the child was suffering pain at the time).

The comments to this entry are closed.