I have been delinquent in my blogging duties because of the amount of deadlines I am trying to meet at work. I argued a supplementary underinsurance motorist issue today at the Appellate Division, Third Department. These types of cases are incredibly fact specific, as the Court of Appeals recognized in Mancuso. My adversary was very civil and so was the panel, although the odds are against me as an appellant . The Third Department heard over 2,056 in the year 2000 but reversed 7% of the time and modified just over 8% of the time.
Post a comment
Your Information
(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)
Comments